Partners
Meanwhile, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that seven emerging markets face a debt crisis probability of 40% or higher – compared to just two before the pandemic – and a further 45 countries face a probability of 20% or higher, compared to 30 before the pandemic. While Covid-19 was first and foremost a global health crisis, its economic fallout is uneven and has disproportionately affected EMDCs.
The war shock – with its economic effects, including the increase in food and energy prices, supply chains disruptions and capital flow reversals, has further increased EMDCs sensitivity to external shocks. This, in turn, makes it even more challenging for EMDCs to roll over their debt.
So far, Advanced Economy’s (AEs) monetary policy response to counter inflation has been centered on central bank interest rates hikes. This response from AE’s central banks, together with quantitative tightening, has resulted in the tightening of financial conditions worldwide, with reduced liquidity, increases in borrowing costs, and added pressure on international reserves. The dollar’s appreciation also puts more pressure on EMDCs’ balance sheets. Approximately half of all cross-border loans and international debt securities are denominated in US dollars. The IMF has warned that despite some progress made by EMDC’s in the issuance of debt in their own currencies, their private corporate sectors continue to be heavily indebted in dollar-denominated debt. Thus, a stronger dollar aggravates debt sustainability problems for a number of EMDCs.
Given the current levels of debt distress among EMDCs, a significant number of debt restructurings can be expected. However, there is a serious concern that the existing restructuring “system” may not be up to the challenge. While the restructuring of bank or corporate debt is guided by the existence of a predictable legal and institutional framework, the sovereign debt restructuring process is a composite of practices and conventions that have evolved over the years. Given both the evolution of capital markets and the emergence of new official bilateral creditors, these practices and conventions – which were already considered as creating a “too little, too late” problem – are under considerable stress. Reforms to date – including the Common Framework – have failed to address a number of key issues. Recognizing the urgency of this problem, the IMF and the World Bank have convened a Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable, which will seek to reach agreement on how the “rules of the road” for sovereign debt restructurings can be improved.
In that context, the roundtable of experts – reflecting the views of a broad cross section of stakeholders- will meet at Columbia University Graduate School of Business to discuss both the key deficiencies of the existing framework and possible avenues for reform. To ensure candor, the event will be closed to the public and Chatham House Rules will apply.
The stakes are high. The events of the last three years have had a deeply negative impact on progress to attain the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In addition to reversing progress in global development, history also reminds us of the deeply polarizing political consequences that debt sustainability problems can have worldwide.